I know way too many fellas who think reading the Puritans puts them on a higher shelf theologically. How arrogant, narrow-minded, and just plain stupid is that? Yes, the Puritans are great to read and soak in, but they also thought that in coming to America, they were ushering in God's millennial kingdom. Many of them also believed that the gifts of the Holy Spirit no longer exist. Some would even use sharp objects to nudge men awake if they fell asleep in church. The Puritans had dozens of things that should never be emulated.
But still.
One of my favorites is "The Doctrine of Repentance" by Thomas Watson. His whole book defines what he calls "gospel repentance." He says that "repentance is a spiritual medicine made up of six special ingredients." They are:
- sight of sin
- sorrow for sin
- confession of sin
- shame for sin
- hatred for sin
- turning from sin
In his section on sorrow for sin, Watson says that part of this sorrow comes corporately - in partaking of the Lord's Table with contrition. He says that
A repentant frame is a sacramental frame. A broken heart and a broken Christ do well agree. The more bitterness we taste in sin, the more sweetness we shall taste in Christ.
4 comments:
Remember, though, Watson was an English Puritan that was around a little bit before the American Revolution. Most of the Puritans we read are from England, and don't have much to do with the America being the New Israel stuff. The only American Puritans that are read much are like John Cotton, Cotton Mather, and if you want to consider Jonathan Edwards. The English guys were probably postmillenialists, but so were Carey, and Fuller. I think we could all use a healthy dose of postmillenialism myself.
oops
ive been pushing through watson's book slowly for the past couple of months. It's been a good one and convicted me in many areas of my life. God bless the puritans...seriously.
for anything on God's holiness/greatness or our sin, I immediately turn to a puritan. ha
Post a Comment